Ciria Report 108 Concrete Pressure On Formwork -
This article breaks down every aspect of CIRIA 108, explaining how to apply its formulas, why it outperforms older standards like ACI 347, and how to prevent formwork failure on your next pour. Before CIRIA 108, engineers primarily relied on hydraulic pressure formulas, assuming that fresh concrete behaved like a liquid (Pressure = Density x Depth). While this approach (often called the "hydrostatic" model) is safe, it is wildly uneconomical. It assumes that until concrete hardens, every inch of height exerts full fluid pressure.
When using SCC, many engineers use a modified CIRIA approach with a coefficient between 1.8 and 2.5, or simply default to full hydrostatic pressure (D x H) for formwork safety. Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them Despite its clarity, CIRIA 108 is often misapplied. Here are the top five errors observed on job sites: Mistake #1: Using the Wrong Setting Time (E) Most contractors take E from a concrete test certificate done at 20°C. If your pour is at 10°C, E might be 3x longer. Rule: Always adjust E for ambient and concrete temperature. A 5°C drop can double E. Mistake #2: Ignoring the "Jump" in Rate The formula uses average rate of rise. But if a pump starts suddenly at 4 m/hr for the first 15 minutes, the bottom formwork experiences a pressure spike. Solution: Use the peak instantaneous rate, not the average over the whole pour. Mistake #3: Overlooking Vibration Depth CIRIA 108 assumes internal vibration is stopped 1.5m below the current concrete level. If you over-vibrate (running the head too deep), you liquify the stiffened concrete, resetting the pressure to hydrostatic at that depth. Mistake #4: Pouring in High Winds Wind load is external, but CIRIA 108 only covers internal concrete pressure. For tall, slender formwork, wind can add 0.5 to 1.0 kN/m² of suction, stacking on top of P_max. Mistake #5: Using CIRIA 108 for Slipforming Slipforms have their own rules. CIRIA 108’s static formulas do not directly apply to continuously moving formwork (use CIRIA 59 or equivalent instead). Practical Implementation on Site How do you turn CIRIA 108 into actionable formwork design?
Use a simple plumb line mark on the formwork with a time log. Or use modern IoT sensors that trigger alarms if the pour rate exceeds your R_max. ciria report 108 concrete pressure on formwork
Published by the Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA), Report 108 fundamentally changed how the industry calculates the lateral pressure exerted by fresh concrete. Even with the advent of Self-Compacting Concrete (SCC) and modern admixtures, the principles laid out in this 1985 report remain the industry benchmark.
The report revolutionized formwork design, allowing for lighter, faster, and more economical systems—without sacrificing safety. To understand CIRIA 108, you must abandon the "liquid assumption." This article breaks down every aspect of CIRIA
Research (including later CIRIA updates) shows that for SCC, the coefficient (1.2) is insufficient. SCC can maintain fluid-like behavior for longer, leading to near-hydrostatic pressures.
Introduction In the world of concrete construction, few elements are as critical—and as often misunderstood—as lateral pressure on vertical formwork. Over-pour a wall or misjudge the setting rate of a column, and the result is a blowout: thousands of dollars in wasted material, potential worker injury, and crippled project timelines. It assumes that until concrete hardens, every inch
ACI 347 uses empirical curves based on column size. CIRIA 108 is more scientific for walls and unusual geometries because it explicitly accounts for the concrete's hydration chemistry. For complex projects, many engineers run both and use the higher (safer) value. Special Cases: Self-Compacting Concrete (SCC) Standard CIRIA 108 was written before SCC became ubiquitous. SCC has much higher flowability and longer setting retention. Does CIRIA 108 still apply?
