The 1998 version is superior because Mulan fails . She struggles through training. She gets hit. She makes mistakes. Her victory is earned through grit, not a mystical birthright. The live-action film is beautiful but soulless; the animated film is scrappy, funny, and infinite. For years, Mulan 1998 has held a complex place in Asian-American representation. On one hand, it was a massive step forward: a lead Asian character who was not a sidekick or a stereotype. On the other hand, the casting of white actors (Eddie Murphy, B.D. Wong, Miguel Ferrer, Harvey Fierstein, James Hong aside) as Chinese characters remains a sore point of "yellow-washing."
After Mulan is wounded, the film executes its most devastating sequence: the "Mulan is a woman" reveal. It is not played for laughs. It is played as a betrayal. Shang, the man she has bled beside, raises his sword to execute her. The film has the courage to let her be completely abandoned. mulan 1998
The 2020 version removed Mushu, removed the songs, and attempted to make the film a gritty, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon -style epic. In doing so, it removed the heart . It introduced the concept of "Chi" as a magical superpower, accidentally arguing that Mulan was special because she was born with magic, not because she worked hard. The 1998 version is superior because Mulan fails
Consider the scene at the Matchmaker. In Cinderella , the heroine passively endures abuse. In Mulan , the heroine tries desperately to conform, fails spectacularly (pouring tea into the Matchmaker’s sleeve and setting her dress on fire), and is told she has disgraced her family. She makes mistakes
Looking back at today, it is not just a "good Disney movie." It is a mission statement. It is a mirror. And when you look into that reflection, you don't see a princess. You see a soldier.