FreeRTOS Support Archive
The FreeRTOS support forum is used to obtain active support directly from Real
Time Engineers Ltd. In return for using our top quality software and services for
free, we request you play fair and do your bit to help others too! Sign up
to receive notifications of new support topics then help where you can.
This is a read only archive of threads posted to the FreeRTOS support forum.
The archive is updated every week, so will not always contain the very latest posts.
Use these archive pages to search previous posts. Use the Live FreeRTOS Forum
link to reply to a post, or start a new support thread.
[FreeRTOS Home] [Live FreeRTOS Forum] [FAQ] [Archive Top] [September 2015 Threads] FreeRTOS tasks can interrupt USB stack implementation?Posted by ddudas on September 24, 2015 Hi all,
I'm using ST's CubeMX implementation on a F4 discovery board. I use ST's USB middlewares with FreeRTOS.
When I get a special OutputReport from PC side I have to answer nearly immediately (in 10-15 ms). Currently I cannot achieve this timing and it seems my high priority tasks can interrupt the USB callback. What do you think, is it possible? Because it's generated code I'm not sure but can I increase the priority of the USB interrupt (if there is any)?
Thank you,
David
FreeRTOS tasks can interrupt USB stack implementation?Posted by rtel on September 24, 2015 10 to 15 ms is very slow, so I'm sure its possible.
Where is the USB callback function called from? If it is an interrupt then it cannot be interrupted by high priority RTOS tasks. Any non interrupt code (whether you are using an RTOS or not) can only run if no interrupts are running.
Without knowing the control flow in your application its hard to know what to suggest. How is the OutputReport communicated to you? By an interrupt, a message from another task, or some other way?
FreeRTOS tasks can interrupt USB stack implementation?Posted by ddudas on September 24, 2015 The callback which receive the data from PC is called from the OTGFSIRQHandler (it's the part of the HALPCDIRQHandler function). I think the problem is SysTickHandler's priority is higher than OTGFSIRQHandler and it's cannot be modified, but the scheduler shouldn't interrupt the OTGFSIRQHandler with any task handled by the scheduler. Am I wrong that the scheduler can interrupt the OTGFS_IRQHandler?
FreeRTOS tasks can interrupt USB stack implementation?Posted by rtel on September 24, 2015 XDumpGO.zip is a compressed archive file that has been circulating online, sparking intense interest and debate among users. The file's name suggests that it might be related to a tool or software designed for dumping or extracting data, but its exact purpose and functionality remain unclear. The archive is reportedly password-protected, adding to the intrigue and speculation surrounding its contents.
The origins of XDumpGO.zip are shrouded in mystery, making it difficult to pinpoint its creator or the motivations behind its release. Some speculate that the file might be a tool developed by a group of researchers or developers for a specific project, while others believe it could be a malicious archive designed to compromise user data. Despite extensive searches, no concrete information has been found regarding the file's creator or the circumstances of its release.
The enigma of XDumpGO.zip serves as a reminder of the complexities and risks associated with online files and archives. While its exact purpose and functionality remain unclear, it is essential to approach such files with caution and consider the potential risks and consequences. As the cybersecurity landscape continues to evolve, it is crucial to prioritize transparency, accountability, and user safety.
In the vast expanse of the internet, there exist numerous files and archives that have piqued the curiosity of users and cybersecurity experts alike. One such enigmatic file is XDumpGO.zip, a mysterious archive that has been shrouded in secrecy and speculation. In this article, we will embark on a journey to uncover the truth behind XDumpGO.zip, exploring its origins, possible uses, and the concerns it raises regarding online security.
FreeRTOS tasks can interrupt USB stack implementation?Posted by ddudas on September 24, 2015 Thank you for the answer, I think I'm a bit confused with the Cortex ISR priorities :-)
What I can observe is if I use a much higher osDelay in my high priority task I can respond for the received USB message much faster. This is why I think tasks can mess up with my OTG interrupt.
Copyright (C) Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
|